Play easy game and win cash (New user only)
1.Download the APP.
2.Install the APP.
3.Verify your Mobile number(Must)
4.Use Android devices only.
1.Download the APP.
2.Install the APP.
3.Verify your Mobile number(Must)
4.Use Android devices only.
Skydive from high as possible and reach for the treasures up in the sky!
Skydive from high as possible and reach for the treasures up in the sky!
collect diamonds and coins and upgrade your bag size and jump height.
The Parachute features:
- Simple, fun and addictive gameplay. Tap to skydive and catch as much treasures as you can!
- Upgrade your bag and jump height and reach new records.
An American Heart Association Journal has published a study confirming that mRNA-based vaccines can cause myocarditis in certain adolescents and young adults.
A peer-reviewed study published in the journal called Circulation examined the cases of 16 adolescents and young adults hospitalized at Massachusetts General Hospital or Boston Children's, suffering from post-vaccination myocarditis from January 2021-February 2022.
It concludes that those 16 young people had "markedly elevated levels of full-length spike protein" in their blood, "unbounded by antibodies.""Rarely, some individuals develop myocarditis after mRNA vaccination," it reads. "The immune response driving post-vaccine myocarditis has not yet been elucidated. Understanding the immunophenotype associated with mRNA vaccine–induced myocarditis is an essential first step in preventing negative complications resulting from this novel vaccine technology."
In other words, the researchers still aren't sure why some people experience this dangerous type of heart inflammation while others don't.
Overall, it seems to back research by the Florida Department of Health that found that the mRNA vaccines are associated with an 84% increase in cardiac-related adverse events among males 18-39 years old.
It may also lead to answers about a recent disturbing trend of seemingly healthy young adults suffering, and in some cases dying, from heart issues.
"This evidence is definitive and basically, non-controversial. It's a definitive pathological diagnosis of vaccine injury," explained Dr. John Campbell, a retired nurse teacher from the U.K. "These are recognized, but rare complications."Censorship of Medical Concerns
Other doctors, physicians, and medical experts have been targeted on social media for questioning the safety of the mRNA vaccines.
Robert Malone, an mRNA vaccine pioneer-turned-critic, had his LinkedIn account abruptly shut down after he mentioned the spike in the context of heart inflammation reports among young men, Just the News reported.
Reuters and the left-leaning PolitiFact both "fact-checked" Malone for claiming that the spike protein is "cytotoxic" and can harm children. "The spike proteins are harmless, do not cause illness, and do not last long in the body," PolitiFact claimed last year. "Malone is the self-proclaimed inventor of messenger RNA vaccines, though that description has been disputed."
TikTok also banned an informational video by Malone. "A viral gene will be injected into your children's cells. This gene forces your child's body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children's critical organs," he had explained on the site.
And as CBN News reported, the U.S. government pressured Twitter into suppressing information from medical experts about COVID-19.
Rhode Island physician and former Brown University epidemiologist, Andrew Bostom, had his account suspended from Twitter after receiving multiple strikes for alleged misinformation. One of the violations was for a tweet referring to the results from a peer-reviewed study on mRNA vaccines. He says it was considered a violation only because it "cited data that was legitimate but inconvenient to the public health establishment's narrative about the risks of flu versus Covid in children."The Scientific Debate Continues
The new Circulation study did not find the free-floating spike protein in 45 "healthy, asymptomatic, age-matched vaccinated control subjects." So the study's authors say the evidence of myocarditis in certain cases should not be taken as a sign that the COVID-19 vaccine is harmful. "These results do not alter the risk-benefit ratio favoring vaccination against COVID-19 to prevent severe clinical outcomes," it reads.
Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical's teaching hospital, also downplayed the findings in a press release, saying, "Risk of severe COVID-19 continues to outweigh rare risk of post-vaccination myocarditis."
But University of California San Francisco epidemiologist Vinay Prasad completed a peer-review study that claimed that the CDC and FDA are not evaluating all the evidence correctly.
"The highest incidence of myocarditis ranged from 8.1-39 cases per 100,000 persons (or doses) in studies using four stratifiers," reads Prasad's paper.
"Dose 2 is worse than dose 1. Moderna is worse than Pfizer," Prasad wrote in an accompanying essay for the Sensible Medicine newsletter Tuesday. "But these differences are lost in analyses that lump together products or combine young men and old women."
Cancer deaths in the U.S. have decreased by 33 percent over the past three decades, according to a new study from the American Cancer Society.
The study — published on Thursday in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians — estimated that this has resulted in about 3.8 million fewer deaths. After peaking in 1991, the mortality rate from cancer has continued to fall over the last 30 years due to a decrease in smoking and improved cancer detection and treatment, according to the study.
This trend continued in 2020 — the most recent year for which data is available — with another 1.5 percent decrease in mortality rates compared to 2019.Two times more deaths were averted among men than among women —about 2.6 million compared to about 1.2 million — which the study attributed to a higher peak and faster decline in the death rate among men. Men still have a higher mortality rate from cancer than woman, despite this rapid decrease.
A drop in mortality rates from lung cancer has been a particular driver of this trend, the study noted. However, lung cancer remains among the most deadly forms of cancer, holding the highest death rate for both men and women.
Cancer was the second-leading cause of death in the U.S. in 2020, behind heart disease and followed by COVID-19.
To reduce the harmful health effects of sitting, take a five-minute light walk every half-hour. That’s the key finding of a new study that my colleagues and I published in the journal Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
We asked 11 healthy middle-aged and older adults to sit in our lab for eight hours – representing a standard workday – over the course of five separate days. On one of those days, participants sat for the entire eight hours with only short breaks to use the bathroom. On the other days, we tested a number of different strategies to break up a person’s sitting with light walking. For example, on one day, participants walked for one minute every half-hour. On another day, they walked for five minutes every hour.
Our goal was to find the least amount of walking one could do to offset the harmful health effects of sitting. In particular, we measured changes in blood sugar levels and blood pressure, two important risk factors for heart disease.
We found that a five-minute light walk every half-hour was the only strategy that reduced blood sugar levels substantially compared with sitting all day. In particular, five-minute walks every half-hour reduced the blood sugar spike after eating by almost 60%.
That strategy also reduced blood pressure by four to five points compared with sitting all day. But shorter and less frequent walks improved blood pressure too. Even just a one-minute light walk every hour reduced blood pressure by five points.
In addition to physical health benefits, there were also mental health benefits to the walking breaks. During the study, we asked participants to rate their mental state by using a questionnaire. We found that compared with sitting all day, a five-minute light walk every half-hour reduced feelings of fatigue, put participants in a better mood and helped them feel more energized. We also found that even walks just once every hour were enough to boost mood and reduce feelings of fatigue.
People who sit for hours on end develop chronic diseases including diabetes, heart disease, dementia and several types of cancer at much higher rates than people who move throughout their day. A sedentary lifestyle also puts people at a much greater risk of early death. But just exercising daily may not reverse the harmful health effects of sitting.
Because of technological advances, the amount of time adults in industrialized countries like the U.S. spend sitting has been steadily increasing for decades. Many adults now spend the majority of their day sitting. This problem has only gotten worse since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. With the migration to more remote work, people are less inclined to venture out of the house these days. So it’s clear that strategies are needed to combat a growing 21st century public health problem.
Current guidelines recommend that adults should “sit less, move more.” But these recommendations don’t provide any specific advice or strategies for how often and how long to move.
Our work provides a simple and affordable strategy: Take a five-minute light walk every half-hour. If you have a job or lifestyle where you have to sit for prolonged periods, this one behavior change could reduce your health risks from sitting.
Our study also offers clear guidance to employers on how to promote a healthier workplace. While it may seem counterintuitive, taking regular walking breaks can actually help workers be more productive than working without stopping.
Copyright 2013 Health & Fitness
Designed byTemplate Trackers Published..Blogger Templates